Defending religious neutrality in healthcare

The BC Humanist Association (BCHA) is back in court defending something fundamental: your right to access public healthcare free from religious interference.

In our written submissions, filed last week with the BC Supreme Court, we make a clear case: when the government funds and delivers healthcare, it has a constitutional duty to remain religiously neutral. That means no one should be denied care because of someone else’s beliefs.

But right now, that’s exactly what’s happening.

In parts of BC, patients can be denied or delayed access to legal medical services because religiously affiliated institutions are allowed to opt out. As we argue in court, the government cannot pass off its responsibilities by contracting services to private providers and then looking the other way. Public care must meet public standards.

This case is about fairness, dignity, and equal access. It’s about ensuring that when you or your loved ones need care, your treatment is based on medicine—not religious doctrine.

READ OUR SUBMISSIONS

This work is only possible because of you.

Intervening in a case like this takes significant time, expertise, and resources. From legal research to court submissions, BCHA relies on the support of our community to stand up for secularism and human rights in spaces where it matters most.

Your support makes it possible for us to bring these arguments forward; to challenge unjust systems and push for a healthcare system that truly serves everyone.

The stakes are high, and the work isn’t done yet.

Closing arguments begin on Monday, April 13.

We’ll be there because of you.

Your gift helps us keep up the fight.


A first draft of this post was written with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Sign up to receive updates from the BC Humanist Association




Created with NationBuilder Creative Commons License