Canadian Government tables bill to repeal blasphemy law

Minister of Justice Jody Wilson-Raybould today introduced a bill to repeal Canada's blasphemy law. The bill would also remove other outdated and unconstitutional provisions of the Criminal Code, strengthen protections for victims of sexual assault and require new government bills to include a Charter Statement explaining its impact on Canadian's rights.

Section 296 of the Criminal Code states that anyone who publishes a "blasphemous libel" could face up to two years imprisonment. In 2016, nearly 7500 Canadians signed an e-petition calling on the government to repeal the law. In her response, the Minister promised to address the provision as part of the Liberal's election commitment to reform the justice system.

Ian Bushfield, Executive Director, BC Humanist Association:

We continue to see people subjected to investigation and prosecution for blasphemy from Jakarta to Dublin. Today's news is a good step toward Canada joining the ranks of Denmark, Malta, Iceland and England and Wales who have all abolished their blasphemy laws in the past decade.

This bill is a step towards upholding freedom of expression and freedom of religion. We urge all MPs and Senators to rally behind this bill and ensure its speedy passage through Parliament.

As Canadian Journalists for Free Expression points out, repealing the blasphemy law is necessary as it likely contravenes the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, blasphemy laws are often used to persecute vulnerable minorities and theocratic states around the world point to our law to justify their own.

Read the government's explanation for Bill C-51 (not related to the previous anti-terror legislation).

Read the bill

Donate to help us keep up the pressure

Showing 4 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2017-06-07 18:05:58 -0700
    Progress at last. Hopefully the CONservative religious fanatics in the House and Senate fail to derail it.
  • commented 2017-06-07 12:36:04 -0700
    Hi TM: Apologies for the confusion. In a business meeting, Canadians will say “table” to put an issue off. For government to introduce legislation, we say they “table it for first reading” though. So this is a new bill that now has to go through our debate process: 3 “readings” or votes in the House of Commons and a committee stage and then another 3 readings and committee in the Senate.
  • commented 2017-06-07 12:03:41 -0700
    Am I just misunderstanding that way table is used in Canada or does the headline mean that the bill is being ignored? If it is, why does the headline mention it being ignored, but the article itself doesn’t address why and what the plans are for getting the bill back on the table?
  • commented 2017-06-06 18:13:03 -0700
    Canada, along with most the world’s progressive nations, are long past requiring laws to protect those who believe in myth and supersition.
    Only theocractic nations require punishment for blasphemy in order to protect the theocracy itself, for without those laws the theocracy would collapse beneath the weight of secular reason.

Created with NationBuilder Creative Commons License